The Locally Owned Voice of the Capital Region
Ken Schott's Parting Schotts
by Ken Schott

Parting Schotts

A Daily Gazette sports blog
Ken Schott blogs about college hockey & more
 

Costas comments on Redskins nickname controversy

By Ken Schott
Sunday, October 13, 2013

Last December, NBC Sports' Bob Costas delivered a halftime essay on "Sunday Night Football" on gun control after Kansas City Chiefs linebacker Jovan Belcher shot his girlfriend to death, then drove to Arrowhead Stadium and committed suicide.

At halftime of NBC's "SNF" game between the Washington Redskins and Dallas Cowboys in Arlington, Texas, Costas gave his thoughts about on whether or not the Redskins should change their nickname.

NBC Sports PR provided the transcript.

"With Washington playing Dallas here tonight, it seems like an appropriate time to acknowledge the ongoing controversy about the name 'Redskins.'

"Let's start here. There is no reason to believe that owner Daniel Snyder, or any official or player from his team, harbors animus toward Native Americans or wishes to disrespect them. This is undoubtedly also true of the vast majority of those who don't think twice about the longstanding moniker. And in fact, as best can be determined, even a majority of Native Americans say they are not offended.

"But, having stipulated that, there’s still a distinction to be made. Objections to names like 'Braves,' 'Chiefs,' 'Warriors,' and the like strike many of us as political correctness run amok. These nicknames honor, rather than demean. They are pretty much the same as 'Vikings,' 'Patriots,' or even 'Cowboys.' And names like 'Blackhawks,' 'Seminoles,' and 'Chippewas,' while potentially more problematic, can still be okay provided the symbols are appropriately respectful - which is where the Cleveland Indians with the combination of their name and 'Chief Wahoo' logo have sometimes run into trouble.

"A number of teams, mostly in the college ranks, have changed their names in response to objections. The Stanford Cardinal and the Dartmouth Big Green were each once the Indians; the St. John's Redmen have become the Red Storm, and the Miami of Ohio Redskins - that's right, Redskins - are now the Red Hawks.

"Still, the NFL franchise that represents the nation's capital has maintained its name. But think for a moment about the term 'Redskins,' and how it truly differs from all the others. Ask yourself what the equivalent would be, if directed toward African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians, or members of any other ethnic group.

"When considered that way, 'Redskins' can't possibly honor a heritage, or noble character trait, nor can it possibly be considered a neutral term. It’s an insult, a slur, no matter how benign the present-day intent. It is fair to say that for a long time now, and certainly in 2013, no offense has been intended. But, if you take a step back, isn't it clear to see how offense 'might' legitimately be taken?"

What are your thoughts? Email me at schott@dailygazette.com. Please keep the responses clean and respectful. I will post responses on a future blog posting.

For more on the topic, including Snyder's views, click here.

Follow @slapschotts on Twitter. Follow @dgazettesports on Twitter.

 
Share story: print print email email facebook facebook reddit reddit

comments

 

columnists & blogs


Log into Dailygazette.com

Forgot Password?

Subscribe

Username:
Password: