It is interesting read what the Evolutionists have to say about Intelligent Design. They talk like they know something that we don’t. First the reason Macro evolution is called a theory is because there is no real evidence to support the cute little stories that Darwinists make up. You know the stories Darwinists make up about how it might have happened. At least ID is based on real informational and probability science. It might be helpful to read “The Edge Of Evolution” by Dr. Behe concerning mutations if you think ID is not science based. If you really don’t want to teach anything in science that is not proven to be true, How do you explain the teaching of Macro evolution. Macro evolution, changing from a fish to a dog or a pig to a whale, is no more true than the story about the tooth fairy. If you are going to speculate in front of children about how macro evolution might have happened I see no reason why we can’t speculate in front of children about how Intelligent Design might have happened. It seems to me that believing in ID is far more helpful to society at large then believing that we are nothing more than a fortuitous accident and no one cares if we live or die.... I wish all you Darwinists would stop trying to connect ID with creationism. Lets be honest, Darwinism is all about religious belief and the fear there might be a God. How else can you explain the massive campaign to prevent the teaching of ID in the classrooms by any means including manipulations, exaggerations and even lies about religious connections. All you Darwinist should calm down and live and let live. Most people don’t care if you believe in God or don’t believe in God. its your choice, Live with it. tfagan
Posted on January 27 at 11:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It is interesting read what the Evolutionists have to say about Intelligent Design. They talk like they know something that we don’t. First the reason Macro evolution is called a theory is because there is no real evidence to support the cute little stories that Darwinists make up. You know the stories Darwinists make up about how it might have happened. At least ID is based on real informational and probability science. It might be helpful to read “The Edge Of Evolution” by Dr. Behe concerning mutations if you think ID is not science based. If you really don’t want to teach anything in science that is not proven to be true, How do you explain the teaching of Macro evolution. Macro evolution, changing from a fish to a dog or a pig to a whale, is no more true than the story about the tooth fairy. If you are going to speculate in front of children about how macro evolution might have happened I see no reason why we can’t speculate in front of children about how Intelligent Design might have happened. It seems to me that believing in ID is far more helpful to society at large then believing that we are nothing more than a fortuitous accident and no one cares if we live or die.... I wish all you Darwinists would stop trying to connect ID with creationism. Lets be honest, Darwinism is all about religious belief and the fear there might be a God. How else can you explain the massive campaign to prevent the teaching of ID in the classrooms by any means including manipulations, exaggerations and even lies about religious connections. All you Darwinist should calm down and live and let live. Most people don’t care if you believe in God or don’t believe in God. its your choice, Live with it.
tfagan
On Education Report: Creationism, intelligent design have no place in science courses