Comments by stockadian
Posted on March 25 at 4:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I really have no desire to debate someone who cannot write in a manner that would pass basic middle school level writing competency. Sorry Dadlobby. I do wonder if any teachers in the reading audience feel the need to take a red pencil to your writing. Have fun with your errors. But you may have the final word, as I know that is extremely important to you. You will hear from me no more.
Posted on March 25 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wrong, FrankLowe. The second amendment states firstly, that the reason the right to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed, is that a WELL REGULATED militia is necessary to a free state, nothing else. Why do pro-gun people like you always neglect to understand, repeat, and express that most important part of the First Amendment? Without it, there is no right to bear arms. It is you who twists the amendment, not us.
Posted on March 24 at 7:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Dadlobby. I would send no one. I would simply pass laws that "well regulates" your right to bear arms, as THE CONSTITUTION states. Go ahead though. Try and confuse the issue a bit more.
Posted on March 23 at 10:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What are the second and third words in the second amendment? In case you have forgotten they are "well regulated." I see that as meaning we can regulated the hell out of your right to keep and bear arms. Remember, they are also part of the Second Amendment. I suggest that "well regulated" means that we begin stressing those two words in the second amendment, regulating who can own a gun, how old they must be, where it can be used, regulate training and licensing to use such a piece of equipment, tax it, a lot like we do for Driver licenses, alcohol, gambling, and many other things that the government regulates. WELL REGULATED can mean what ever we want it to mean. You are right, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." But it also, according to the same amendment can be WELL REGULATED.
Posted on December 24 at 9:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Fascists would deny others from reading a book because they do not agree with it! How sad that a few Americans would object to a book being sold in an American book store. What is happening to America? I lay this at the feet of bigots like Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. Shame on them!
Posted on December 17 at 7:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I disagree with the Gazette. I once moved to a home that was too close to traffic, and, laugh if you wish, but the traffic noise kept me awake. I should have known better, checked out the home before buying, perhaps spent more time there before signing on the dotted line. It was my fault. I eventually sold that home to someone else who apparently did not mind that traffic noise. I did NOT insist that the municipality change the traffic route. Franklin Rapp's business was there first. I am certain that home builders and investorsheard the noise but simply saw dollar signs. Who's fault is that? Mr. Rapp's? I don't think so.
Posted on October 22 at 4:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
NO ONE is killing babies. You need to stop misusing our language, Denny Empie. If you choose to call a fetus or an embryo or even a zygote (if you are not sure what those words are, please look them up) a baby, that is your religious choice, but they are not babies. The supreme court gives the right to women to end a pregnancy. Stop accusing women who decide to make such a choice as allowed by the government as killers. You are misusing the English Language, when you do so. There is little one can do to even discuss a subject when someone such as you misuses the language you think you are using correctly.
Posted on August 10 at 10:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
GPlante227 Of course graffiti is a problem. But why would you detract from a well written letter concern the casino sign by writing a sub-letter about your favorite point....vandalism? Why not write your own letter to the editor? Unless you are a supporter of the casino sign? To me, that sign will be one giant piece of graffiti.
Posted on March 24 at 5:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Such a lovely couple.
Posted on February 18 at 8:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What is the most aggravating is that these "leaders" of the community are costing the rest of us real money. They should be ashamed. I can never look at these people with much of a smile ever again, knowing that they have taken money out of your pockets and mine. How ugly is that?