Comments by rswanker
Posted on October 21 at 10:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Fewer resources. Hah. With a market cap of $259.56, and $143B in annual sales? (acc. to Forbes). Typical.
Posted on September 12 at 7:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow....I should read the whole review first. Definitely eye contact made between Pat and Gavin, Gavin and Jakko, Tony and Gavin, etc. Maybe your seats were too far away to see all this? ;)
Posted on September 12 at 7:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sorry, I saw plenty of smiles on stage (though maybe not from Fripp or Rieflin, and maybe only rarely from Harrison). Pat M looked especially looked to be having a great time.
Posted on September 8 at 7:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
We actually have water here in Schenectady, and I think the pipes even go to the college. No need to bring cases of bottles. Amazing, right? Well, its the City that Lights the World (and Has Water)!
Posted on June 17 at 6:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why go to Chili's when there's La Mexicana on State St.? Great little Mexican place, casual but great food.
Posted on June 14 at 1:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
According to this article, anecdotally, more children are hurt handing out candy than are hurt trying to catch thrown candy.
Posted on May 30 at noon (Suggest removal)
wmarincic, please explain what axe the accusers had to grind? If it can be proven that the detective did as he is accused, that is certainly an axe worth grinding.
Posted on May 11 at 7:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
jjhehir — agree that someone should be held accountable. Unfortunately, the current Republican outrage seems focused on proving that somehow the scandal was how the White House was managing press releases (which they all do, right?) — rather than *why* something like this was allowed to happen to begin with. Doesn't seem like we're looking in the right places. And although I will concede that any investigation must start somewhere.
Posted on April 18 at 1:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lucia was actually a good restaurant. Applebee's is not. Sad.
Posted on April 6 at 10:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why would the city council decide on the contractor for a privately owned business who's tenant is a county agency?