The Locally Owned Voice of the Capital Region

Comments by ronzo

Previous | Page 3 of 18 | Next

Posted on December 21 at 5:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Daniel: The ACA was passed by a feeble Democrat controlled Congress, and a weak White House that didn’t have the guts to legislate Medicare Part E, as in "E" for everyone in this country. That's what made it truly a poor piece of legislation. I am angered that the Wall St. oriented insurance companies have no problem making a profit from my health or lack of health, at my expense, to feed their profits that deny me and my family medical services, allowing only services that they decide I will receive, for their egregious premiums. Hopefully these “glitches” and ACA implementation missteps will be for the good, and Americans will realize that healthcare for all, what the no backbone Democrats couldn’t accomplish is in the best interests of America and will come to fruition. It would not surprise me if all these faux-pas are intentional as an after the fact realization that the dumb Democrats and dumber Obama administration finally realizes the consequences of not passing a single payer health care law.

From: Mandela may have been a great man, but he wasn’t a saint

Posted on December 3 at 7:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Health Act: If the Supreme Court rules in favor of this challenge, this could lead to other religious based restrictions by business owners on employees. Jewish owned businesses could require their employees not eat pork products, Muslim owned businesses could require that their employees pray to Mecca every day, Mormon owned businesses could require that their employees not consume coffee or alcohol, Christian Scientists could demand total exemption from providing health insurance to their employees based on their beliefs, etc. When will it go too far? How would the Constitution affect this ruling?

From: Editorial wrong to criticize Scotia binding arbitration award

Posted on November 30 at 1:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

wmarincic: since many of your posts have a military orientation, and since folks like you want less government, why don't we get rid of the defense department and privatize the military especially since it is causing some states such financial hardship? Then those states could tax military paychecks that are issued by private corporations. After all since private business can manage better than government management, military spending would obviously go down if it was privatized (no more $500 hammers). Since less government is better, where better to reduce it than the defense department which, as you state, consumes the majority of federal and state spending. Who is Krugman?

From: Glenville board listened, will hear public on job shift

Posted on November 30 at 12:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)

wmarincic: and these southern red states that enticed the manufacturing jobs from the unionized rust belt with their right to work laws giving their people the right to work for lower wages. Why aren't they prospering? Is that why their people are so poor that they take so much welfare from the Federal government? Exactly what industry are you referring to in NY? The ones that existed in the pre-Reagan years? NY lost its industrial base long ago and still takes care of its people by yes, taxes, much of which goes to Washington then on to the Red States of the south.

From: Glenville board listened, will hear public on job shift

Posted on November 30 at 12:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)

tonijean613: what you describe are some of the fundamental tenets of a single county based school system. But instead, the little individual school district turfdoms that have their own singular interests prevail over one that benefits everyone in a county, not only for educational reasons but also for cost to the taxpayer reasons.

From: Decide on importing students, already

Posted on November 30 at 9:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Phils2008: Your statement is very true. The number of takers IS on the rise not the decline. Red State welfare is running rampant, taking more federal dollars than what they contribute. The high taxed Blue States are forced to support those who'd rather take than contribute; the epitomy of socialism. Is Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, Kentucky, etc. just a bunch of lazy people causing them to be poor, or do their leaders plan it that way knowing that the socialist Federal government will take care of them, willingly distributing wealth from the giver states to them. They, the Red States should give thanks for what we ALL have and give thanks to the states that share our blessings with them via the Federal government.

From: Glenville board listened, will hear public on job shift

Posted on November 30 at 7:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Who are these people? Are they the ones who resist merging their school district with others to gain efficiencies and provide an equal education opportunity for all students in the county? Are they so uppity to think that opening their schools to everyone will allow the seepage of rif-raff from other places into their schools – as exemplified by the fortress-like black fence that secures the school grounds on Balltown Rd.? But they advocate the cherry-picking of students from wealthier families in the county and want to “invite” them into their schools for a hefty fee? And that's not only OK but condoned? Who are these arrogant uppity snobs?

From: Decide on importing students, already

Posted on November 27 at 6:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Rob Dickson - Your statement has truth when stated in another way. Using some of your words: I think it’s just disgusting that even though “our dear leader” knew that “Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction” and it would cause turmoil and death to our brave American military, of historic proportions and, yet, he continued to lie to America, by telling us that we should like his “national security” policies and we should keep him, over and over again. 4000+ Americans dead for what? Mission Accomplished. How many are now dead from the Affordable Care Act, that doesn’t start until January 1, 2014?

From: Dems need to be voted out for their dishonesty about Obamacare

Posted on November 26 at 4:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Tax incentives: a scam to get for some people what they want at the expense of others. Just look around Malta and the “build it and they will come” brand new buildings along Rte. 9 that are empty, waiting for the hundreds of businesses that will locate here because the State “gave away” the people’s money to entice a business to come here. Drive through Luther Forest and witness the vast expanse of “roads to nowhere” built for all the Global Foundries suppliers to bring their business and thousands of jobs. The entire scam is a bad deal for everyone. Especially us taxpayers who foot the bill for the multinational companies that are here on a free ride. Some of the jobs are here, and at what cost to New York taxpayers?

From: Lessons on planning and zoning from Ellis parking garage saga

Posted on November 25 at 12:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

reader1: that's exactly my point - salary and benefits. How much salary and benefits for duplicate police chiefs and command staffs within a county can be saved and applied to more effective use of police resources. Like maybe deploying more police officers per shift within a county. This is the only place where I have lived that does not have county based services like schools, fire and police protection, etc. And has THE highest tax rates. I just cannot understand why people here are so resistant to efficiencies that can result in lower property taxes.

From: Niskayuna standoff tied to family dispute

Previous | Page 3 of 18 | Next

columnists & blogs

Log into

Forgot Password?