Comments by rjk1915
Posted on November 6 at 6:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The word is "affected", not "effected".
Posted on October 22 at 9:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
A careless use of language bothers some people, including me. This can't be a "portrait"; no one can say what she actually looked like.
Posted on October 19 at 8:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is a case of over-regulation. How many people would have been affected? And how many of those would actually read the label? And what would they have done without the law? Too many laws leads to disregard of the law.
Posted on September 13 at 3:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree that some of the library material is unfortunate, but there will always be a bottom 10%, and it does get them in the door.
Posted on September 4 at 10:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Any excuse for a "protest".
Posted on September 2 at 7:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Things change. What was once objectionable becomes necessary. As the level of civilization decreases, so must the level of the quality of control needed to maintain it. Sufficient knowledge of history leads to pessimism. Maybe there is no salvation.
Posted on September 2 at 6:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Much of the public doesn't understand what libraries can do. The catch is that the segment available to teach already knows about it.
Posted on July 27 at 7:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Would this have been a legal gun ?
Posted on June 19 at 10:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There will always be a lower class. You can't mandate intelligence.
Posted on June 19 at 10:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What do you mean by "should". And what would be the upper limit ? Isettas ? Cadillacs ?