Comments by reader1
Posted on July 29 at 11:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Agreed, this is a loss.
Posted on July 29 at 10:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think the biggest issue is that a private entity, able to afford to pay for cops as private security, is incurring a cost that a third party (taxpayer) must shoulder (pension liability).
This could get messy.
Posted on July 26 at 3:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It was a reasonable question. While I am aware of incidents like these occurring elsewhere I do not recall any reports, certain non recently, of this type of behavior. The Gazette being a local paper, I was assuming that was the audience this commentary was directed to. In fact, they were reacting to a local incident, or more accurately - a local example of a national phenomenon.
ChuckD - You see things I don't. This article was clearly about interference with the media and civilian's right to film officers' behavior in public.
Posted on July 26 at 10:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
How often has this happened within this reporting area?
I've seen reports of it elsewhere, but do not recall a local incident outside of this one.
Posted on July 19 at 9:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Apparently the judge didn't feel that way. The point you were trying to make was clear, the rationale as to why she would receive it was missing.
Posted on July 18 at 5:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Agreed, he left money on the table to return home.
From: LeBron Goes Home
Posted on July 18 at 5:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes, it's easy to appreciate what the privacy concerns could be, but, this article seemed to raise a concern about simply being monitored at this particular public event. I do not disagree at all that this technology could be abused re: privacy issues. Additionally, as the editorial page pointed out today there are significant safety issues. A few weeks back, a pair were arrested in NYC because their recreational use of a drone endangered a helicopter in flight.
Posted on July 18 at 5:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Agreed, there was already an incident in NYC re: a helicopter and a small privately owned drone being used for recreational purposes.
Posted on July 18 at 5:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Bail has to do with ensuring your appearance at court - is she a flight risk?
Posted on July 17 at 5:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
RE: The privacy issue - Outside of the drones' mobility, what is the difference between the drone and cameras owned by businesses and mounted outside of their respective buildings in the downtown area?