Like it's obvious you didn't know what you were talking about. Instead you choose to plagiarize someone else's work and try to show it off as your own work with no mention of the original author, even going as far as starting off the post with "I know" as if it was knowledge you had. Downright shameful and disrespectful.

So wmarincic, if you think what happened 800 years ago is no longer relevant, that means you agree that the area that is now Israel properly belongs to the Palestines? You can't have it both ways, ya know.

wmarincic already forgot about the crusades. Where christians killed millions of muslims for not believing in jesus. Far far more than christians killed by muslims.

So if they're Christians willing to die for christ, they're "noble". If they're muslims willing to die for Allah, they're terrorists. Got it. Glad to see hypocrisy is alive and well.

Unlike some ignorant misconceptions, those in Guantanamo are NOT known terrorists. They are people who have been accused, in many cases falsely, but then imprisoned indefinitely without a trial. And oh, this is what I found when I googled the supposed "Christian stoning" http://www.freep.com/article/20120616/NE... It was a group of crazy Westboro type Christians following muslim families around at a festival yelling at them, brandishing a pig head in their faces, and throwing stuff at them. Then when some of the families started to return fire in self-defense by throwing things back, the christians claimed they were being "stoned" by muslims. Really?

Replace "gay" and "homosexual" with another mistreated minority, like "black", and you see how wrong and ridiculous some of you people sound.

So you're saying you're agreeing with Kevin O'Connor, who was saying that Gandhi's name and words should not have been used in the debate.

Are you really trying to say things are worse in India now than before Gandhi? Blaming Indian poverty on Gandhi is like American blaming school shootings on the American Revolution.

".9 mm handgun"? Is that like a BB gun? Or did the writer mean "9 mm"?

Let's be clear - If a conservative doesn't like something (like abortion or same-sex marriage), they pass laws to ban it. When liberals see something hurting the American people, they pass laws to regulate (not ban) them to be most fair to everyone.