Comments by dod
Posted on December 31 at 9:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Do any of the family members question why their little 19-year old innocent darling was in possession of a loaded handgun? Or why he would not just pull over like a normal civilian would, oh it's because he had an outstanding warrant and should have been under lock and key in the first place. Then, you have these "community activists" crying out about the injustice of it all. Give me a break, these officers are real people with real families and children. Do you honestly think they should have given it a second thought when some scumbag pulls a loaded gun out on them? The article states these officers have exemplary records, guaranteed "NahCream" has a rap sheet a mile long.
Posted on December 22 at 9:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
they were off duty how can the city take time away from the persons involved
Posted on January 3 at 3:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Is that the same county where legislators, political party chairs, and the administrators of the Sheriff's Department secretly whisper amongst themselves about cutting the Sheriff's road patrol unit? Yeah, cutting police in that county sounds like a good idea to me!
Posted on January 3 at 3:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
No...Bobby is too busy trying to get a foot into the Sheriff's Department.
Posted on August 9 at 6:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Tom Little was a great person. I extended my sympathies to his family and friends.
Posted on June 15 at 9:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It wasn't Mark, try reading again.
Posted on February 26 at 9:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This "over payment" is due to trying to compete with private industry for the top talent. If they could have attracted the same level of proficiency, competance and experience for a much lower salary I am sure they would have done that years ago.
Posted on October 2 at 12:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)