Comments by Woodrow
Posted on October 22 at 9:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Nice muse on your trip north. Thanks Irv.
Posted on October 19 at 2:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Since there hasn't been any successful or memorable baseball played at Fenway lately, they might as well have someone successful play there.
Posted on October 5 at 12:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It looks good, but I can't see the whole page now, and have to use the slide bar to move over. I have a 19" monitor, and don't have this with any other website. If I adjust system parameters for this site, then my other other sites will be too small.
Is anyone else having this issue?
Posted on October 4 at 1:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's a simple question; not who are you voting for. You can vote for Ron Paul and still answer the question about the debate.
Posted on October 1 at 10:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I guess the retiring Senator McDonald wasn't so proud of his "principled stand" after all. The most memorable vote he's ever made, and he wants it forgotten. hmmm...
Posted on September 26 at 12:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What would be the point? He hasn't a chance of winning on a third party line. If he's bitter and wants to spoil the election, then he should do that.
Why doesn't he do what most losing candidates do?...graciously congratulate the winner and step aside for the good of the party.
Posted on September 26 at 11:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
airedale and robbump - Some can discuss politics, some can't without getting personal about it.
Posted on September 25 at 4:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Posted on September 25 at 12:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
airedale1950 - So kind of you to provide education on polictical donations. What would we simpletons do without you...
The difference, of course, with Sen. McDonald is that he was the deciding vote. He was not a likely vote for same-sex marriage, yet he became a "principled" supporter after Mayor Bloomberg kicked in $10 grand to start, which was followed by many more donations, then voila! Senator Roy McDonald made history.
My point is that McDonald wasn't a SSM supporter before the quid pro quo vote, and he's not been a mouthpiece for gay causes since. Therefore he's a hypocrite...in my opinion, of course.
Posted on September 24 at 10:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If Senator McDonald had said No to the tens of thousands in cash given ahead of his vote, you might say his vote was principled. But he didn't.
He said Yes to the cash, and Yes to same-sex marriage. He wasn't a vocal supporter of same-sex marriage before the vote, and he's kept quiet since. Senator McDonald is a phony, and his constituents are not stupid.