A test of human will is not torture. Anything that stops short of perminent damage is not torture. Testing the human will in an attempt to break the human will is a part of War. In basic training it is a part of War preparation and during War it is definately a moral way to interrigate. It is honorable for both the interrigator and the interrigated.
If the interrigated is able to withstand the test of will they will only be the better for it. If they do not stand the test of will then our objective of saving lives is a success and the interrigated will learn something about themselves. As long as there isn't perminent damage or sexual abuse the dignity of the human person is up held and all can benefit from it.
Waterboarding is not torture. It is a test of the human will and a good test at that. Too many in Congress are too soft and have never been tested. We need to thow them out of office. Inmature people like this should not be permitted to lead.
September 6, 2008
Posted on March 15 at 11:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
A test of human will is not torture. Anything that stops short of perminent damage is not torture. Testing the human will in an attempt to break the human will is a part of War. In basic training it is a part of War preparation and during War it is definately a moral way to interrigate. It is honorable for both the interrigator and the interrigated.
If the interrigated is able to withstand the test of will they will only be the better for it. If they do not stand the test of will then our objective of saving lives is a success and the interrigated will learn something about themselves. As long as there isn't perminent damage or sexual abuse the dignity of the human person is up held and all can benefit from it.
Waterboarding is not torture. It is a test of the human will and a good test at that. Too many in Congress are too soft and have never been tested. We need to thow them out of office. Inmature people like this should not be permitted to lead.
On Editorial: Bush torture veto more of the same