Comments by SnowGrinch
Posted on October 11 at 3:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wmarincic doesn't care about facts, he cares about opinion... his own opinion.
Any facts that disagree with his opinion are dismissed as being untrue.
Posted on October 9 at 8:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Pnotto. What a disjointed rant!
From "Paper" to "Plastic" to "Obama destroying this country" to "Leftists."
Kudos to the BYO Bag group. Thanks for making a difference in your community.
Posted on July 26 at 9:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mark Markovitz's post is spot on. Jack Welch 'cashed in' the assets that all others built into the company. Welch was the 'rich brat' who inherits a multi generation family business... then sells off all the assets for a quick buck.
Instead of building GE and it's businesses, Welch sold the foundation of the business and left only a fragile shell. For Neutron Jack and like minded CEO's, you should be ashamed!
Posted on April 26 at 10:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The Gun Nuts give their opinion of what is and what is not constitutional. Consider a very Conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's words:
* "Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. [United States v.] Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. *
Posted on April 9 at 7:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
They greed to build their own road when they purchased the property...(Quote)
"Wong said the group agreed to build its own road when it purchased the 76-acre parcel and 63,000 square-foot facility".
They were then notified that as of April 1, the road would no longer be used.
What more could the Shrine do to accommodate the group?
I look at this as a real estate purchase where one party did not live up to it's agreement.
Build the agreed upon road as you promised.
Posted on March 6 at 6:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
For those Amsterdam residents who were born in Puerto Rico... they are not "Illegal" or "Immigrants"... they were born American Citizens and their only "immigration" is inside their own country.
Posted on March 5 at 4:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Smoked Pot? A drug dealer? Used Cocaine?
There is no need to bring George W Bush into this discussion. Of course if we did we could add multiple arrests, DWI's and AWOL from the military.
Wmarincic. You posted an obvious falsehood, then ran from your own words.
You boasted that you had lived in Alaska, AND Hawaii... which we assume gives you a better perspective of life there; "nothing like the lower 48 states", as you put it.
You seem to think that your time in those states gives you added insights into what it is like to grow up there... and I agree.
Just as our President, Barack Hussein Obama, who grew up in Hawaii and in Indonesia, being exposed to multiple cultures, multiple religions, multiple customs, and multiple political systems, gives him an advantage of his insights when leading our country.
Or is that different? Is your expertise living out of the "lower 48" an advantage, while Obama's time spent "out of the lower 48" somehow a disadvantage?
Good for me... shameful for Obama! Again, Clueless!
Posted on March 5 at 9:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If as you stated, "you become who and what you are in the first 18 years of life", no one would ever escape poverty, drug addiction or being shy, if that were there upbringing.
I know I certainly am not who I was at age 7 or at age 17 or even age 27. But Obama's upbringing isn't the subject of my comment.
Your statement that Obama "ACTUALLY SPENT MOST OF HIS LIFE OUTSIDE OF THE U.S." is not true. You could 'man up' and acknowledge your error, but instead you decided to evade the truth and change the subject.
Yes, I've been to Alaska. No, I've not been to Hawaii, and YES, you still seem CLUELESS to actual facts and unable to acknowledge an error.
Possibly that character flaw is the result of your upbringing... your first 18 years of life must have been spent in a clueless environment.
Posted on March 5 at 9:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It is an undisputed "Fact" that Barack Hussein Obama has spent more than half his life living in the USA. That makes wmarincic's statement, that Obama "actually spent most of his life outside of the U.S." false.
Does your politics force you to abandon actual facts?
Posted on March 4 at 6:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm sorry Wmarincic, but your apology still doesn't cover the facts.
Obama lived in Hawaii or in Indonesia from 1961 to 1979... 18 years.
He then moved to your "lower 48 states" and has lived in Los Angles, NY city, Chicago and DC since... 34 years, or almost twice the time that he's lived in Hawaii and abroad.
You accuse liberals of being "CLUELESS" then you make a CLUELESS statement that Obama "actually spent most of his life outside of the U.S" which is false. It appears that your statement, then your redacted statement, which is also false, shows just who is "CLUELESS!