The Daily Gazette
The Locally Owned Voice Of The Capital Region
Advertisement
Promotions

See Past Polls

February 12, 2010 Poll Results

Should residents of public housing be allowed to have pets?

Yes 46% 108 votes
No 53% 124 votes
Total: 232 Votes

Note: This is not a scientific poll. The results reflect only the opinions of those who chose to participate.

comments

bocesterri
February 12, 2010
8:05 a.m.

[ Flag Post ]

I believe they should be allowed to have A pet.
One only!

MDogsMom
February 12, 2010
9:25 a.m.

[ Flag Post ]

I believe they should be allowed to have pets, but, limit the number, size and clearly regulate where dogs can go and require leashes for dogs when they leave their apt.

sc
February 12, 2010
9:38 a.m.

[ Flag Post ]

If you can't afford housing, you can't afford pets. If you have extra money for pets, you have extra money for bills or unassisted living instead.

nygirl61
February 12, 2010
10:32 a.m.

[ Flag Post ]

The people who live in public housing can barely feed themselves... how on earth are they going to feed and care for a pet? The answer is, they won't and the place will be overrun with feral cats and riddled with sick dogs! And how unfair to the animals!

acostanzo
February 12, 2010
4:01 p.m.

[ Flag Post ]

it's troublesome that some people lack so much common sense that rules/laws have to be made to tell them how to live *sigh*

mhowie
February 12, 2010
4:46 p.m.

[ Flag Post ]

I thought what sc thought, actually ... not that I'm against people having pets, but in most cases, wouldn't that money better be spent on bills?

columnists & blogs