CARS HOMES JOBS

Gazette polls



Should residents of public housing be allowed to have pets?

Yes 46% 108 votes
No 53% 124 votes
Total Votes: 232

Note: This is not a scientific poll.

comments


February 12, 2010
8:05 a.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
bocesterri ( bocesterri ) says...

I believe they should be allowed to have A pet.
One only!

February 12, 2010
9:25 a.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
MDogsMom ( MDogsMom ) says...

I believe they should be allowed to have pets, but, limit the number, size and clearly regulate where dogs can go and require leashes for dogs when they leave their apt.

February 12, 2010
9:38 a.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
sc ( sc ) says...

If you can't afford housing, you can't afford pets. If you have extra money for pets, you have extra money for bills or unassisted living instead.

February 12, 2010
10:32 a.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
nygirl61 ( nygirl61 ) says...

The people who live in public housing can barely feed themselves... how on earth are they going to feed and care for a pet? The answer is, they won't and the place will be overrun with feral cats and riddled with sick dogs! And how unfair to the animals!

February 12, 2010
4:01 p.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
acostanzo ( acostanzo ) says...

it's troublesome that some people lack so much common sense that rules/laws have to be made to tell them how to live *sigh*

February 12, 2010
4:46 p.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
mhowie ( mhowie ) says...

I thought what sc thought, actually ... not that I'm against people having pets, but in most cases, wouldn't that money better be spent on bills?

 

columnists & blogs


Log into Dailygazette.com

Forgot Password?

Subscribe

Username:
Password: