57° F | Schenectady, NY
Court of Appeals hears Raucci case
Associate Judge Victoria A. Graffeo makes a point to Attorney Alan J. Pierce in the matter of New York State Office of Victim Services vs Steven C. Raucci on Thursday afternoon. Pierce argued for Steven and Shelly Raucci that Raucci's pension checks of $5,800.00 per month, are exempt from seizure under the Son of Sam Law and Social Security Law, which protects the pensions of public employees.
Judge Robert S. Smith, at far left, and Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, at right, listen intently.
Alan J. Pierce speaks before the State of New York Court of Appeals in the matter of New York State Office of Victim Services vs Steven C. Raucci in early January. Pierce argued for Steven and Shelly Raucci that Raucci's pension checks of $5,800.00 per month are exempt from seizure.
Alan J. Pierce speaks before the State of New York Court of Appeals in the matter of New York State Office of Victim Services vs Steven C. Raucci on Thursday afternoon. Pierce argued for Steven and Shelly Raucci that Raucci's pension checks of $5,800.00 per month, are exempt from seizure under the Son of Sam Law and Social Security Law, which protects the pensions of public employees.
Shelley Raucci confers with Attorney Alan J. Pierce in the State of New York Court of Appeals building on Thursday afternoon.
Pierce argued for Steven and Shelly Raucci that Raucci's pension checks of $5,800.00 per month, are exempt from seizure under the Son of Sam Law and Social Security Law, which protects the pensions of public employees.
