The Daily Gazette
The Locally Owned Voice of the Capital Region
Advertisement
Promotions

Gazette Editorial

Mother no criminal for leaving child in car unattended

  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • LINKEDIN
  • PRINT
  • E-MAIL
Text Size: A | A

It’s hard not to sympathize with the 28-year-old mother who, realizing she’d left her cellphone in the library, covered her 5-month-old daughter up with a blanket, locked her in the car and ran in to retrieve it — only to get cited by police for endangering the welfare of her child when she returned reportedly three minutes later. Of course any number of tragic events could have ensued as Mom dashed into the library. Someone ...


You Must Log-In or Subscribe to Continue Subscription Offer Individual stories can be found and purchased from our Archives for $2.00

Advertisement

comments

reader1
May 6, 2014
6:10 a.m.

[ Flag Post ]

What is the allowable amount of time you can leave a child unattended and out of sight?

If it would be acceptable for one, the it would be acceptable for all. So, would the writer find it acceptable to walk through the Proctor's parking lot and see 3 or 4 children left alone in this manner?

Perhaps the hypothetical scenario of the mother getting injured is unlikely. But, Car break-ins are a fairly typical crime problem.

And, why did she do it - because she didn't feel like going through the effort of taking the child back in with her.

rpandori
May 6, 2014
7:07 a.m.

[ Flag Post ]

It's unfortunate that we can't always do what other people deem as right, but in this case one has to wonder. A five month old baby is helpless. Although nothing catastrophic happened it could of and very easily. Babies that age tend to spit-up, simply by burping and then in the three minutes that followed could have choked. In this busy world we live in we tend to forget our priorities, common sense doesn't apply. The life of the unprotected should have been the priority, not the cell phone!

robbump
May 7, 2014
2:42 p.m.

[ Flag Post ]

ALL kinds of things COULD have happened, but in the long run, NOTHING did. That should be the end if the story, rather than concocting "what-ifs". ("What-if" the mom had taken her kid out of the car and dropped it while the parent slipped on the steps? .... see how "what-ifs" can mutate?)
-
It gets a little tiring of OTHER people telling us how WE should or should not be raising OUR children. If you do/don't want your kids doing something, then direct them to (or not to). I won't correct you -- and meanwhile, you allow me the responsibility to make my decisions too.

reader1
May 8, 2014
4 a.m.

[ Flag Post ]

This is not about telling people how to raise their children. It is about placing children at risk, regardless of the duration.

RE: What-ifs - clearly a person accidentally slipping on the steps is not the same as leaving it unattended. And, because the child was left unattended - others had to step in an ensure the safety of the child.

They stop being your decisions when they affect a third party, one unable to protect themselves.

wmarincic
May 8, 2014
6:53 a.m.

[ Flag Post ]

The bottom line is simple, she put this child at risk because she did not want to be inconvenienced by removing the child from the car seat and carrying the child back into the library. What I will say though is that because this mother was at a library rather than a bar or grocery store. tells me it was probably a one time lack of judgement.

joycemadre
May 8, 2014
11:05 a.m.

[ Flag Post ]

wmarincic ... I agree whole heartedly!! Everyone has these moments unless you are a saint and I havent ready of anyone being ordained lately. Lets use common sense and not always be on the hunt to condemn for every thing. Lets all try to be more supportive,riding high horses get nowhere. Past generations have not had to live up to such standards, and it seems our quality of our society hasnt gotten better with these standards.

Advertisement