The Locally Owned Voice of the Capital Region

Editorial: First honey, then vinegar for violators

Sunday, July 6, 2014
Text Size: A | A

Time will tell whether Schenectady’s get-courteous, as opposed to get-tough, approach to residential code violations will achieve the desired effect, or simply be treated with scorn by scofflaws.

It’s worth a try, perhaps, but only if the city is serious about following up when violations turn up.

As we’ve noted in the past, the city doesn’t always hold residents and business people accountable for their actions, or inaction — whether it’s motorists running red lights, residents refusing to shovel their walks or recycle their trash, or convenience store owners looking the other way when drug deals are going down in front of them.

Typically, when officials give such scofflaws a pass, they suggest it’s because they aren’t sure the violators knew what they were doing was wrong.

Even if that were so, which in most cases seems hard to believe, ignorance is no excuse. That’s especially so when there’s been a lot of publicity about an issue or the officials have conducted a public relations campaign to alert people how they want things done.

Will giving property owners the benefit of the doubt — handing them “courtesy” warnings instead of citations when building inspectors discover violations — make them more likely to buy into the city’s program? It may with some.

But there are a lot of landlords in Schenectady, among other financially squeezed property owners, who don’t care what their properties look like and who don’t want to hear the city’s sugar-coated rationale for fixing them up.

They may simply look at the warnings as another opportunity to stall, to bleed their property before selling or abandoning it.

Granted, an adversarial approach isn’t always the most practical because going to court can be time-consuming and expensive. But a lot of these properties — and landlords — have long histories. And in cases where they are blatant and the property owner is obviously thumbing his nose at the law, the city should be less patient. And in all cases, it should follow up “courtesy” notifications with return visits and a more business-like approach.

Mayor Gary McCarthy indicates that will happen. We hope he’s not just saying it.

Share story: print print email email facebook facebook reddit reddit


July 6, 2014
9:07 a.m.
+0 votes
joycemadre says...

The first one to be held accountable should be the city. They seem to allow work /construction to be done without following their own codes. When that happens to damage someones property then its then its prosecute the victim. If plans are not constructed to code and its allowed - I think that is on the code enforcement. They should too be held accountable.

July 6, 2014
10:26 a.m.
+0 votes
tonijean613 says...

Courtesy notices is clearly the best approach. But, Mayor and Council should revisit and remove small items that most would agree should not be violations and stop adding such outrageous penalties for small issues. There are too many impoverished people too many elderly. Clearing the sidewalks of snow should be a city obligation and they should use those small sidewalk bulldozers you see many well run cities use. Most in Schdy don't have any place to put snow other than in the street to allow it to melt quicker which is common sense. Instead, the City is giving out violations for this? Residents cant control how much snow falls. And we cant expect our elderly/disabled to shovel or pay others.. Sometimes it's safer to walk on snow than shoveled sidewalks that tend to be more slippery after shoveling. So Code needs to make sense and fines need not be so high.


columnists & blogs

Log into

Forgot Password?