The Locally Owned Voice of the Capital Region

Editorial: Reserve judgment in Taser case

Sunday, August 24, 2014
Text Size: A | A

What kind of message does it send to police officers and the criminal element of society when an officer can automatically be suspended without a hearing after using a non-lethal method of force to subdue a suspect?

That's what happened in Troy when an Albany County sheriff's deputy was suspended, without pay, for using a Taser on a 16-year-old suspect in a high-speed car chase. The teenager had refused to obey an officer's orders to lie on the ground while he was being arrested.

The officer may indeed have gone overboard in securing an unarmed suspect who was in the process of surrendering. But maybe the officer's actions were justified. Only a full investigation will determine that. The only evidence of misconduct was a video snippet of the incident taken from a police car's dash-top camera.

The camera showed the suspect on his knees with his hands up and the officer shooting his Taser at the teenager. It would seem the suspect had been rendered a non-threat. But the officer says the suspect was refusing to completely comply with the officer's directives, and that's why he used the Taser.

Yet without fully investigating the matter, according to the officer's attorney, the Albany sheriff suspended the officer without pay and started disciplinary proceedings about the improper use of a Taser, essentially conceding wrong-doing by the officer.

We understand what's happening here. The fatal shooting on August 9 of an unarmed suspect in Ferguson, Mo., by a police officer, along with another fatal shooting of a knife-wielding suspect in St. Louis on Tuesday, are still fresh in our minds.

Police department leaders are ultra-sensitive these days to any allegations of police brutality in the wake of these incidents and others.

Officials are very mindful of how the public might react, particularly when part of an incident is caught on videotape and flashed across social media.

But there's a big difference between what happened in Missouri and what happened in Troy.

In Missouri, both suspects were killed in the process of being arrested. In Troy, the kid was unharmed. That's because the local sheriff's deputy used non-lethal force to subdue the suspect; the police in Missouri did not.

That's what Tasers are designed and used for, as an alternative to bullets. The suspect gets a brief electric shock that temporarily stuns him so police can get cuffs on him. In only rare instances is a suspect killed or seriously injured from a Taser. Gunshots are often fatal.

Of course we need to be sensitive to police brutality. It happens all too often. Citizens, even criminals, have a right not to be abused by people in authority brandishing weapons.

But we also have to support police in the difficult practice of doing their jobs and encourage them to use non-lethal alternatives to subdue suspects whenever possible.

And when officers do choose that non-lethal option over killing a suspect, they should be given a greater benefit of the doubt — from the public and from their superiors.

Share story: print print email email facebook facebook reddit reddit


August 24, 2014
6:58 a.m.
+1 votes
reader1 says...

I question whether the editorial writer "understands what's happening here" with respect to the investigation of this case. I think it would have been prudent to provide some proof to support the allegation that the deputy was unjustly suspended deputy due to "hypersensitivity" to an event occurring halfway across the country. I see no such evidence provided in this article.

Management is certainly not infallible, but, this article basically second guesses the decision of a manager, who certainly has more facts re: the situation, than the Gazette editorial board. And, they do it based on the thin premise that because there is a highly controversial use of force case in another part of the country, local law enforcement managers will rush to judgment.

The writer also seems to base their argument on the wrong headed premise that the choice is always between deadly force or taser.

August 26, 2014
8:21 a.m.
+0 votes
tonijean613 says...

Tasers are lethal and inhumane. The gross militarization of police across America is becoming apparent in the killing of Michael Brown-. Police tactics in full SWAT riot gear in itself is TERRORIZING - for Adults as well has children. This is not the America we are led to believe is supposed to be so much better and humane than the rest of the world. And this is all done in the name of Freedom and security? There is no freedom in living under a police state. Its shameful. The solution to reducing crime in general is to take all that money they use for war, and militarizing police, for profit prisons, and put it to better use improving schools, improving neighborhoods, skills building, and simply combating poverty. Violence, drugs, theft is all rooted in poverty and desperation.


columnists & blogs

Log into

Forgot Password?