Decide on importing students, already

Saturday, November 30, 2013
Text Size: A | A

Last spring, the Niskayuna school board talked about soliciting tuition-paying foreign students as a way to raise money and add diversity to its homogenous student body — two valid objectives. Unfortunately, the idea didn’t get very far. Now the board has expanded the idea to include students from around the region, too. Well, all right then. Why not?

There’s nothing wrong with Niskayuna or any other school district taking in a few or even a handful of students as a way to augment revenues and increase diversity. But there are some concerns, and the board needs to explore them fully before opening the floodgates.

The district can’t very well ask its taxpayers to subsidize the education of outsiders in any way, so it has to make sure the tuition it would be allowed to charge would be enough to cover its expenses. (It can only charge what the state Education Department allows under a formula that varies from district to district.)

The district also has to be sure that letting in outside students would, in no appreciable way, hurt its own students. The locals can’t be shut out of any special programs or electives at the expense of imported students.

There are probably some situations (such as a class operating well under capacity) where the district wouldn’t be increasing its costs, or compromising any of its own students’ experience by increasing the class’ size slightly. As a story in last Sunday’s Gazette indicated, a number of school districts in the region have, at various times, taken on outside students under such circumstances, making anywhere from $7,280 to $13,742 per student, depending on the student’s age and what State Ed. has allowed the district to charge. (The host district gets no share of state aid from the outside student’s district, thus the tuition is necessary to defray its costs.)

And there are certainly going to be costs, even if none are a direct result of increasing a particular class’ size by just one student. Thus the district shouldn’t expect to make much money doing it.

It makes more sense from the standpoint of exposing the student body to kids from different backgrounds than their own, similar ones; perhaps even a different country and culture.

But the school board has bandied this issue about long enough. Do the study needed to determine whether it can be at least budget-neutral, then decide whether to go forward.

Share story: print print email email facebook facebook reddit reddit


November 30, 2013
7:10 a.m.
ronzo says...

Who are these people? Are they the ones who resist merging their school district with others to gain efficiencies and provide an equal education opportunity for all students in the county? Are they so uppity to think that opening their schools to everyone will allow the seepage of rif-raff from other places into their schools – as exemplified by the fortress-like black fence that secures the school grounds on Balltown Rd.? But they advocate the cherry-picking of students from wealthier families in the county and want to “invite” them into their schools for a hefty fee? And that's not only OK but condoned? Who are these arrogant uppity snobs?

November 30, 2013
10:54 a.m.
tonijean613 says...

The Economic and Social divide cannot be more apparent than in Schenectady County-
Nisky and Schdy High. The County should encourage a student exchange/lottery to promote diversity and study the effects on learning. Or what about exchanging the teachers to see what effect that may have on learning. What makes one district better than the other? Is it the really the quality of the teachers or the wealth of the population? Does Nisky really have better teachers than Schdy? If so why?

November 30, 2013
12:18 p.m.
ronzo says...

tonijean613: what you describe are some of the fundamental tenets of a single county based school system. But instead, the little individual school district turfdoms that have their own singular interests prevail over one that benefits everyone in a county, not only for educational reasons but also for cost to the taxpayer reasons.

Log-in to post a comment.

columnists & blogs

Log into

Forgot Password?