Editorial: A decade of smoke-free indoors

Thursday, July 25, 2013
Text Size: A | A

Yesterday was a real occasion for celebration: the 10th anniversary of New York state’s expanded Clean Indoor Air Act, a law that has been a success any way you look at it.

There are many actions government can take to reduce smoking, e.g. education, health warning labels, high taxes and advertising restrictions. All have been tried to one degree or other, with varying degrees of success. But none is so effective as simply banning the noxious activity in most public and private indoor work areas, as the state did on July 24, 2003.

The state law followed a similar one adopted by New York City in March 2003, at the beginning of Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s first term. Bloomberg then, as now (with his calorie count requirements for fast-food restaurants and sugary drink restrictions), was interested in improving public health.

And cigarettes have been proven to endanger health — not just the smoker’s but those around him, through secondhand smoke. It is the protection of those people, many of them nonsmokers who were not asked for their consent before exposure, that justifies public smoking bans.

At first, there was opposition to these laws. Smokers claimed their rights were being violated, while bar and restaurant owners complained their businesses would be adversely affected. But after a brief period during which smokers stayed home, they started returning to their favorite haunts, realizing they could get by for a couple of hours without lighting up — or if they couldn’t, that they could do it outside.

Others, who hadn’t been going out much or at all because they couldn’t stand the smoke, started going out more often. New York City now has 6,000 more bars and restaurants than before the ban took effect. And those places not only are healthier for patrons and employees, they are cleaner (no smoke to dirty mirrors and chandeliers and clog air conditioner filters), which saves their owners money.

Smokers and owners no longer complain about the law — in fact, most support it — and a random sample by the state Bureau of Tobacco Control this year of taverns and restaurants statewide showed a compliance rate around 99 percent. Meanwhile, smoking rates for adults are down, as are hospitalizations for smoking-related diseases.

Good policy, good law.

Share story: print print email email facebook facebook reddit reddit


July 25, 2013
7:29 a.m.
muggy says...

The writer seems to support the concept of a nanny state. What would we citizens do without the state telling us how to live our lives? For example, the state tells us what type of light bulbs we can use, how much water we can use in our toilets, what types of stoves, washing machines, microwaves, refrigerators, we can use. The state dictates how many miles/gallon we must get in our cars. The once powerful Ford trucks are moving away from steel to aluminum and plastic in order to comply with EPA mandates. Does anyone champion LIBERTY anymore?

July 25, 2013
10:08 a.m.
albright1 says...

Could you back up your blather by producing citations for your statement that there are 6000 more bars in NYC and hospitalizations for smoking-related diseases are down??

I doubt you can produce proof of those statements.

Log-in to post a comment.

columnists & blogs

Log into

Forgot Password?