CARS HOMES JOBS

Sch’dy pre-K needs sustained volunteer reading program

Thursday, April 11, 2013
Text Size: A | A

Sch’dy pre-K needs sustained volunteer reading program

Re the April 6 editorial, Who will read to, with, Schenectady kids?: Significantly, it neither mentioned nor hinted at the need to deal with the large, mostly underfunded pre-K population in Schenectady.

With or without a volunteer reading program for children already enrolled in district schools, there will be a continuing need to promote reading among the pre-K kids destined to enter the district schools principally at the kindergarten level.

Unless that need is met, massively, there can be little hope that the district will be able to deal with the reading problem. Currently 6,000 students in all grades, nearly two-thirds of the district’s students, are reading below grade level; over time, many of them will likely fall further below grade level in a wide array of courses requiring them to be skilled readers. It’s not unrealistic to expect the number of such students to increase yearly.

Passing through adolescence and adulthood, those without a strong foundation in the written language will find themselves denied the joys and benefits of advanced formal education, wide career opportunities and broad cultural engagement.

It’s time to mount a continuing, massive, year-in, year-out volunteer reading program centered on the city’s 4-year-olds, with key roles played by parents, religious and other social organizations, educational institutions, and the business and arts sectors.

Alvin Magid

Niskayuna

The writer is a professor emeritus of political science at the University at Albany.

Fracking, tar sands no way to go fossil-free

Ten years ago, we embarked on a $4 trillion war, destroying Iraq for its oil.

A March 23 letter [“No good reason to oppose Keystone Pipeline plan”] pushed Keystone XL tar sands exploitation. On March 31 an Opinion piece [“Fracking hardly the only source of river sediment”] again promoted hydrofracking. What do these have in common? They all push severe fossil-fuel extraction that permanently destroys lives, land, water and our very climate.

We are addicts who will do anything for one more fix. We are hitting bottom. Let’s admit our problem, our mistakes, and move down the road to recovery.

An independent Stanford study (Mark Jacobson, et al.) just documented how New York could become fossil-fuel free in 20 years, with a net gain from our investments.

We need to take the next step. We can do it. We have to do it. We need to do it ourselves. We need to push our politicians. And we need to redesign, divest from and/or decommission any pathological corporations that stand in our way.

Let’s be fossil fools no more. Let’s use less. Lets use clean, safe, peaceful renewables.

Pete Looker

Scotia

Omit private money in politics if public is used

The April 4 editorial [“Fair elections mean publicly financed”] shows the Gazette is again behind the times.

Please pay attention! Our governments, on every level, have been spending billions of dollars on campaign financing for decades.

The biggest sums are dished out by the federal government in several ways. Let’s start with Ben Bernanke, head of the Fed and the guy who gives financial institutions (yup, the ones we bailed out) unprecedented amounts in virtually interest-free loans. They loan that money to businesses and individuals and pocket the profit, except for the billions they — the businesses and the millionaires who run them — give to politicians in both parties.

Consider, also, how our representatives secure funding for selected businesses (Solara, General Motors) or educational institutions. The businesses and both management and labor (through the unions) also pour huge amounts into campaigns for public office. The teachers unions are among the biggest contributors to many campaigns.

On the local level, our towns and counties approve special benefits, and incentives, for businesses. These businesses return the favor by donating to the political campaigns of local officials. All this is recorded in the reports of the respective political campaigns, and no one seems to care. Then (heaven help us), when a politicians takes, or pays, a bribe and forgets to call it a campaign contribution, the Gazette acts like Henney Penny and the sky is falling.

All the matching fund concept will do is double the money the politicians get from the public. If public money is given to a campaign, it should be the only money the campaigns could use for a political campaign — no private donations allowed.

Can you imagine how pleasant watching the TV or sorting the mail might be next fall if businesses or individuals who accept (directly or indirectly) public money were prohibited from making donations to political campaigns?

Art Henningson

Rotterdam

Baseball coverage favors Yanks; Mets merit more

We’re only a week or so into the baseball season, and it is already painfully obvious that your paper’s “team of choice” for coverage once again is that insufferable team from the Bronx.

Yankees, Yankees, Yankees. Is that all you can think of? Every day there is a front-page story with quotes from New York players and that “genius” of a manager, plus the mandatory poster-sized color photo of “Fatbathia” or some other Yankee clown.

In case you forgot, there is another team in New York that deserves your attention. They wear blue and orange and reside in Queens. Myself, I’ve been cheering for the Mets for so long that I’ve lost my voice. Yet, the Gazette chooses to stick them inside somewhere, often with a bare score headline over their two-paragraph story.

Would it be too much to ask for something approaching balanced coverage for the New York baseball teams? As it is, your definite bias is showing. I’m sure I speak for many fellow Yankee-haters when I tell you, enough with the Yankees, already! Let’s have some equality in your baseball coverage.

Let’s go, Mets!

ALAN HART

Scotia

Letters Policy

The Gazette wants your opinions on public issues.

There is no strict word limit, though letters under 200 words are preferred.

All letters are subject to editing for length, style and fairness, and we will run no more than one letter per month from the same writer.

Please include your signature, address and day phone for verification.

For information on how to send, see bottom of this page.

For more letters, visit our Web site: www.dailygazette.com.

 
Share story: print print email email facebook facebook reddit reddit

comments

April 11, 2013
9:31 a.m.
cidbil says...

Pipe down ALAN HART. When the Mets stop choking every year and have 27 World Championships then maybe they'll get some respect. The Yankees are the only team in the last 20 years to not have a losing season. Let's be honest (the most over used phrase in sports talk btw), nobody wants to read about a loser. Stop worrying about the Yankees and worry about your own team. Geez.

April 11, 2013
2:24 p.m.
wmarincic says...

The Mets won in 1969.

April 11, 2013
3:58 p.m.
wmarincic says...

Pete Looker, The question to you is this, is your home solar or wind powered? Do you drive a car, use electricity? What about plastic, do you use it on or for anything as these are also all used with petrolium based products. If the Iraq war was about oil, how come only 12% of our oil comes from the whole Middle East including Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emerate. The least expensive and safest energy in the world is Nuclear, but we have not built a new reactor in 30 plus years. I would love to be totally energy independent, but until there REALLY is a better alternative than oil, we are stuck with it.

April 11, 2013
4:32 p.m.
JoeK says...

I totally agree the Gazette favors the Yankees,this not professional journalism on there part.

April 11, 2013
5:32 p.m.
cidbil says...

JoeK: Once again nobody likes to read about a loser. And just to be fair, the Mets have 2 championships, 1969 and 1986. Without looking, I'm pretty sure there were more front page stories about the Mets in those years than there were Yankee stories. When they win they'll receive more coverage. It's that simple win you're on the front, lose and you're buried next to the bowling scores.

April 12, 2013
4:25 p.m.
JoeK says...

typical yankee fan living in the past.You and the sports editor should check the gazette,who has the better record now?

Log-in to post a comment.
 

columnists & blogs


Log into Dailygazette.com

Forgot Password?

Subscribe

Username:
Password: