CARS HOMES JOBS

Marybeth Tinning again denied parole

Now 68, child killer next eligible in January of 2013

Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Text Size: A | A
Marybeth Tinning is shown in a 2007 photo.
Marybeth Tinning is shown in a 2007 photo.

— Convicted child killer Marybeth Tinning has been denied parole again, now for the third time, state parole officials said Tuesday.

Details of the denial were not yet available Tuesday, but if her parole hearing went as it did last time, Schenectady County District Attorney Robert Carney said, he believes the decision to hold her was a correct one.

At her last parole hearing in early 2009, Tinning explained her crime to the parole board by saying she was “going through bad times.”

The parole board concluded then that her expression of remorse was “superficial at best.”

Asked about the denial Tuesday, Carney called Tinning’s 2009 parole testimony a good illustration that she hadn’t come to grips with what she did.

“I think before you can evaluate whether somebody is a risk, you have to believe that the person has acknowledged what they’ve done, and she’s never done so,” Carney said. “That being the case, she’s not been honest with anybody about her behavior. I wouldn’t want to see her around anybody who’s vulnerable, other children or elderly people.

“I wouldn’t trust her at all.”

Tinning, now 68, was sentenced in 1987 to 20 years to life in prison, convicted in the smothering death of her 4-month-old daughter, Tami Lynne. Tami Lynne was killed Dec. 20, 1985.

Tinning was also suspected, but never tried or convicted, in the deaths of seven of her eight other children over a 14-year period. The family lived in Schenectady at the time. Key to her case was a confession in which she allegedly admitted to killing three of her children.

Tinning has had some high-profile backers for release, including the man who got the crucial confession from her. Before her first parole board appearance, William A. Barnes, an investigator at the time with the state police who later served as Schenectady County sheriff, said he believed she was no longer a threat and had expressed remorse.

The presiding judge at Tinning’s Schenectady County Court trial, Clifford Harrigan, also sent a letter in 2007 saying he would not oppose her release, based on information he was provided by Tinning’s appeals attorney.

Tinning’s trial attorney, Paul Callahan, echoed those sentiments Tuesday.

Callahan said his sense from trial jurors at the time was that they weren’t looking for the worst penalty.

“I think everybody thought that after 20 years she’d be out,” said Callahan, who still practices in Schenectady County. He later added, “I don’t see where she’s a threat.”

The parole board’s decision means that Tinning will spend at least two more years in prison. She is next eligible for parole in January 2013.

She was first eligible for parole in 2007. The board denied her then as well as her second opportunity in 2009.

Tinning remains housed at the state’s Bedford Hills Correctional Facility in Westchester County. Tinning’s husband, Joseph, has stood by her since her initial arrest. He has traveled to the correctional facility twice a month for as long as she has been incarcerated there.

 
Share story: print print email email facebook facebook reddit reddit

comments

February 9, 2011
8:49 a.m.
KeepingItReal says...

Many seen to be in agreement for her release. She no longer seems to be a threat. Perhaps there should be some release conditions with respect to her future involvement with children. Considering she was represented poorly at trial and subsequently served 24 years, I think it's only fair that she be paroled.

February 9, 2011
8:57 a.m.
honestabe says...

“I wouldn’t trust her at all.”- Robert Carney.
This person committed crimes against the most defenseless people on the planet, children. She confessed to 3 of them. How is it possible that she even gets parole hearings? She should remain in jail permanently. We, the people, cannot allow anyone to remain free in society when so egregious an act of inhumanity has been committed. I do not wish that anyone be incarcerated, but when something of this magnitude has occurred, then society no choice but to keep someone like this separated from the rest of the populace, especially children.

A person's a person no matter how small.

February 9, 2011
11:15 a.m.
lovemysonj says...

A person who kills 2 or more people is considered a serial killer. Tinning is a serial killer and I certainly wouldn't want her back in town.

February 9, 2011
2:46 p.m.
maggy says...
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
February 9, 2011
6:55 p.m.
maggy says...

what happened to "freedom of speech?". The comments I made, that you removed, were correct and to the point of why she shouldn't ever be released back into society.I think i'll cancel my subscription to this paper!!

Log-in to post a comment.

 

columnists & blogs


Log into Dailygazette.com

Forgot Password?

Subscribe

Username:
Password: