The Daily Gazette - Schenectady, NY
Daily Gazette

Editorial: Bush torture veto more of the same
Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Text Size: A | A | A

Michael Mukasey probably wouldn’t be attorney general today had he not dodged the Senate Judiciary Committee’s questions about waterboarding, an interrogation technique that involves simulated drowning. Mukasey said he wasn’t sure if waterboarding was torture but would look into it, and that was enough for some credulous committee members, including New York Sen. Charles Schumer, to put aside their reservations and vote to confirm him.

Soon after, Mukasey — surprise — reached the same ridiculous conclusion as his boss, George W. Bush: Waterboarding is not torture. Both the Army and CIA disagree, as does Congress, which just passed a law specifically banning the practice. But that doesn’t matter because Bush has vetoed it; and even if he had signed it, as demonstrated in the past, he would ignore it.

Of the many things this president has done to undermine our country’s image and standing in the world, sanctioning torture must be at the top of the list. It has emboldened Muslim terrorists and enraged moderates we need on our side, at the same time making our own troops more likely to be mistreated.

And most experts agree that torture is not necessary. The information, assuming it is still relevant, can usually be gotten through other aggressive but legal techniques — and often it yields bogus information from those who will say anything to stop the torture.

Bush claimed, in his Saturday radio address announcing the veto, that waterboarding has stopped several terrorist attacks. But he has shown before that he is not above making misleading, inflated claims to justify doing what he wants, legal or not. And so, barring the unlikelihood that Congress overturns his veto, George Bush and the United States reserve the right to torture.



Share story:   print   email +digg
+fark
+reddit
+facebook
+del.icio.us
+stumbleupon

comments


March 15, 2008
11:31 a.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
Steve40 ( no real name given ) says...

A test of human will is not torture. Anything that stops short of perminent damage is not torture. Testing the human will in an attempt to break the human will is a part of War. In basic training it is a part of War preparation and during War it is definately a moral way to interrigate. It is honorable for both the interrigator and the interrigated.

If the interrigated is able to withstand the test of will they will only be the better for it. If they do not stand the test of will then our objective of saving lives is a success and the interrigated will learn something about themselves. As long as there isn't perminent damage or sexual abuse the dignity of the human person is up held and all can benefit from it.

Waterboarding is not torture. It is a test of the human will and a good test at that. Too many in Congress are too soft and have never been tested. We need to thow them out of office. Inmature people like this should not be permitted to lead.

Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)

In Today's Gazette...
May 12, 2008

Poll
Should the state and federal government suspend the tax on gasoline from Memorial Day to Labor Day?



See the results




Ask A Doctor