Benjamin J. Turon
Those in the “peak oil” camp, who predict that we are about to run out of easily accessible petroleum, warn that the drop in global oil production will bring dire consequences. Writer James Howard Kunstler, and like-minded groups such as the Capital Region Energy Forum, predict the collapse of Western Civilization and the establishment of an “Amish Paradise.” Yet they forget history and underestimate the technology available to sustain our technological civilization.
First, much of technology is based on electricity, not oil! Computers, telecommunications, lights, industrial machinery, household appliances are electric; electricity can also cook our food and heat our homes. While the power grid needs to be expanded and modernized, North America has abundant energy resources — including coal, nuclear, hydro, tidal, wind, solar and geothermal — to keep us in electricity without depending on oil-run power plants.
There are also substitutes for oil in the many synthetic chemicals and materials that contribute to modern life. Glass, ceramics, metal and wood could substitute for plastic in many products, and much of those products can be recycled. Coal and biomass can also be used as feedstocks for plastics, fertilizers and pharmaceuticals.
We are not so much in an energy crisis as a transport crisis, a troika of increasing congestion, environmental degradation and energy shortages.
As global demand for transport and petroleum products grows as a result of population and economic growth, demand is beginning to exceed supply, leading to an inflationary spiral of prices that could cripple the economy.
The goal should be to switch our transportation from being powered by petroleum to electricity, because electric vehicles can utilize a variety of power sources, and use it more efficiently than internal-combustion engines. Electric vehicles won’t compete with the food supply, as do biofuels, and are more practical than using hydrogen fuel cells. Overall pollution would be reduced, including greenhouse gases.
False assertion
“There is no substitute for oil [or liquid fuels] in transport” is a canard that is frequently uttered in the media by so-called experts. While true for airplanes, it is demonstratively false for transport on land and sea. Maritime transport is very fuel-efficient and could once again run on coal via steam engines or gas turbines. Ships could also utilize sails or kites to save fuel. Europe, with its excellent system of inland waterways, moves more than 40 percent of its freight by water. Perhaps there is a future for the New York State Barge Canal beyond recreational boating.
After a century of retarded development, affordable and practical plug-in hybrid electric cars will soon be a reality due to the advancement of lithium-ion batteries. The cars will be powerful, yet safe and compact. They will get at least 40 miles to the charge, significant because most U.S. commutes are less than this distance. Renault, Nissan, Toyota and General Motors are planning to introduce models early next decade.
Electric trolley buses and trucks can receive electricity directly from the grid by overhead wires. There are globally 353 cities with electric trolley bus systems, including Boston, Dayton, Seattle and San Francisco. Large cities could electrify major thoroughfares for use by streetcars, transit buses and delivery trucks. Eventually even the interstate highway system could be electrified, saving long-distant trucking.
There is a mature, existing technology that has successful use electricity since 1880s. From the New York City subway to the Trans-Siberian Railway, electric trains are hard at work. They carry urban commuters to and from work, hauling heavy freight trains across snowy mountains or scorched deserts, and racing along at speeds of 225 mph on new, inter-city, high-speed railways.
Modern cities were first made possible because electric streetcars and subways allowed us to work and shop farther than we could walk, leading to the dense downtowns, centralized industrial districts, and leafy “streetcar suburbs” of the early 1900s. Los Angeles, the home of the freeway, was actually built by the Pacific Electric Interurban Railway, once the largest rail transit system in the world. In the 1920s more than 2,770 daily trains ran over the 1,060-mile system.
Modern grocery stores also came about because of the railroads. The invention of the refrigerated boxcar allowed grocery stores around the nation to stock apples from Washington, potatoes from Idaho, lettuce from California, oranges from Florida, and dairy products from New England.
Chicago became the center of the meat-packing business because cattle across the nation could be brought to Chicago by cattle car, processed, and then distributed across the nation by refrigerated boxcar.
Chicago also became the center of the mail-order business, most prominently Sears & Roebuck. The competing urban department stores and local general stores could also offer countless goods because of the national and global movement of goods by train and ship.
In the age of the Internet and Wal-Mart, the same holds true, with ships and trains loaded with containers bound for the shelves of big-box stores.
Kunstler correctly identifies the “Happy Motoring” bias of even environmentalists that poisons the debate on energy and environment. A prime example is Thomas L. Friedman of The New York Times, who, in an interview with Discovery Channel for his television documentary “Addicted to Oil,” stated while discussing alternatives to oil that “With Japan they didn’t have a choice. They import 100 percent of their oil . . . so they looked for alternatives and in Japan’s case it was smaller cars and hybrid engines”.
Somehow, Friedman completely forgot Japan’s rail-centric culture. The image of the Shinkansen or “Bullet Train” passing beneath Mount Fuji is an iconic symbol of the nation. Japan consumes far less oil per capita than the U.S. because its people drive less and ride far more trains. Most of its rail network was electrified after the Second World War as a means to become more energy independent by utilizing domestic energy sources. Yet no mention!
Today, America’s freight railroads after decades of consolidation are once again expanding. Innovation in technology and operations has combined with growing congestion and rising fuel prices to win back business from truckers. The railroads are now hauling more tonnage than in any time in history while using the least amount of track, rolling stock, fuel and labor to do so, and lastly they are making record profits.
Market forces
The government could best solve our energy crisis by responding to the market forces already at work, including the quickly rising ridership of Amtrak and regional transit authorities such as the CDTA. Redirecting the postwar subsidies that fueled the expansion of our automotive suburbs to rebuilding central cities and inner-ring suburbs as mixed-use, pedestrian-scaled, transit-oriented communities would be a start.
Next, the U.S. must follow the example of China, and enact a program to electrify the railway network and construct new high-speed lines.
Research and development of electric propulsion for all forms of transport should be increased, including ensuring that utilities can properly supply the increased demand. New public-private partnerships should be set up to harness the financial power of both Washington and Wall Street.
The economic collapse predicted by Kunstler and company need not occur if government, business and science work together. Much of what constitutes modern civilization began before the mass consumption of oil.
A properly informed public and good leadership on all levels of government and corporations can quickly bring the needed changes that will ensure a comfortable and prosperous life for future generations.
Benjamin J. Turon lives in Ballston Spa. The Gazette encourages readers to submit material on local issues for the Sunday Opinion section.
8:49 a.m. [ Suggest removal ]
Electric power comes from burning dirty coal, valuable natural gas, and nuclear. We don't have the power you are talking about. The electric economy of electric tractors/combines, 18 wheelers, trains, buses, and ships will not be developed due to the enormous and complex infrastructure and very high capital costs at a time when the nation is broke.
Global oil production is now declining, from 85 million barrels per day to 60 million barrels per day by 2015. During the same time demand will increase 14%. This is like a 45% drop in 7 years. No one can reverse this trend, nor can we conserve our way out of this catastrophe. Because the demand for oil is so high, it will always be higher than production; thus the depletion rate will continue until all recoverable oil is extracted.
Alternatives will not even begin to fill the gap. And most alternatives yield electric power, but we need liquid fuels for tractors/combines, 18 wheel trucks, train, and mining equipment.
We are facing the collapse of the highways that depend on diesel trucks for maintenance of bridges, cleaning culverts to avoid road washouts, snow plowing, roadbed and surface repair. When the highways fail, so will the power grid, as highways carry the parts, transformers, steel for pylons, and high tension cables, all from far away. With the highways out, there will be no food coming in from "outside," and without the power grid virtually nothing works, including home heating, pumping of gasoline and diesel, airports, communications, and automated systems.
This is documented in a free 48 page report that can be downloaded, website posted, distributed, and emailed: http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnaly...
I used to live in NH, but moved to a safer place. Anyone interested in relocating to a nice, pretty, sustainable area, good climate with much rain and good soil?
3:28 p.m. [ Suggest removal ]
Unfortunately, I concur with everythin cj just said.
Mr. Turon is missing several critical insights that cj just mentioned, and is not accounting for the time it takes to get off of oil.
The 2005 Department of Energy Report (now known as the Hirsch Report, after its lead author) points out that we needed to start *at least* twenty years before reaching peak to have the hope of a soft landing. See http://www.acus.org/docs/051007-hirsch_w... (PDF warning).
Please, get your facts straight and start getting people ready for a future with very, very expensive energy.
-André
3:56 a.m. [ Suggest removal ]
Benjamin,
Excellent article. I count myself as being in the "peak oil camp" (end of cheap oil) but I'm a lot less of a "doomer" than some. I absolutely agree with your central premise:
"The goal should be to switch our transportation from being powered by petroleum to electricity"
As Andre says we need at least a twenty year start for a soft landing and I believe we may be in for a bumpy ride. As you point out the peak in natural gas (much of which will need to be imported as LNG at considerable expense) and coal is further away - however there is no room for complacency. I believe it is possible to be optimistic **if** we make a quick and orderly transition from petroleum to electricity. Unfortunately the mainstream debate remains focused on apportioning blame rather than seeking fundamental solutions.
I also note that while America has excellent tide, solar and wind resources they are currently less than 1% of the energy mix when they could be contributing so much more.
James
Alternative Energy Blog
http://alt-e.blogspot.com
11:42 a.m. [ Suggest removal ]
"Much of technology is based on electricity, not oil! Computers, telecommunications, lights, industrial machinery, household appliances are electric"
True... but how many of these contain plastics? Plastics are made from oil. So we'll be able to run them, but not make them.
5:36 p.m. [ Suggest removal ]
While I agree about technological fixes being possible, and the crisis having more to do with transport than with oil, I must disagree with Mr Turon in some regards.
Trans-oceanic shipping is NOT energy efficient; efficient per product unit per mile, and efficient for the manufacturer who can displace costs, but globalization does not begin and end with container shipping. Raw materials are transported to manufacturing sites. Finished product are first and last transported via trucks and/or rail to distribution and sub-distribution points. Even the consumer adds to transport system by the drive across the county to the Costco, Walmart and Big Box Retailer.
Globalization works for the manufacturer, but not the consumer as fuel costs inexorably rise. There is a range of economies that begin at 'local' then 'regional' then 'state' and then 'national' which must be maintained but are made dysfunctional by today's 'global' economy. The most energy efficient economies are 'regional' and 'state' because efficiencies are not lost in the costs of transport further distances.
Mr Turan is certainly correct about Plug-in Hybrid vehicle technology. Imagine having a portable power source that may prove invaluable in an emergency, grid failure or (dare I say utility price gouging?), may allow households the means to more carefully monitor electricity consumption and power many household appliances; may create an economic incentive to drive less, patronize local economies whereby in time more destinations become accessable without having to drive and whereby walking, bicycling become a more viable travel option and mass transit more practical to arrange. The plug-in hybrid batteries carefully mounted may lower center-of-gravity to improve stability and handling, perfect for top-heavy, roll-prone SUVs or any car. I wonder if the implementation of plug-in hybrid technology is hindered mainly because their average useful lifespans may exceed 200,000 to 300,000 miles, or that the public will thus be invested in an area's utility grid and have more say over utility costs.