The Daily Gazette - Schenectady, NY
Daily Gazette

Village to consider teen curfew
Drinking, vandalism incidents prompt look
Thursday, July 3, 2008

Text Size: A | A | A

— Village officials have drafted a proposed curfew law that, if approved, would make it illegal for anyone under 18 to be on public property between 11 p.m. and dawn, with some exceptions.

The law will need to first go through a public hearing process before the Village Board could vote on the matter.

Under the proposed law, it would be a violation for anyone under age 18 “to be or loiter or remain in or upon the public streets, roads, highways, public lots, public parks or other public areas” in the village after 11 p.m.

Some exceptions to the law include anyone under 18 who is accompanied by a parent, who is on the sidewalk immediately outside his or her property or who is traveling directly to or from work.

“A lot of these young kids, really, what are they doing out after 11 at night if they’re 16, 15 years old?” Village Trustee Norman Richardson asked.

Richardson said there have been problems recently with teenagers drinking alcohol or smoking marijuana in public places. He also said there have been some recent reports of late night break-ins.

According to Richardson, village officials used language from various curfew laws to write the current draft.

Anyone under 18 cited under the proposed law would first receive a verbal and written warning from police. After the first offense, anyone found in violation of the law could be sentenced to community service, a fine not to exceed $250 or 15 days in jail.

Parents of minors could also be cited under the law for permitting their children to violate the law or ineffectively controlling their children.

“Do I think it’s a good idea? I really don’t know yet, but I would say I would give it a shot and see what the people want,” Richardson said.

Several other trustees and Mayor James Groff did not return calls seeking comment Wednesday.

Local representatives from the American Civil Liberties Union did not return calls seeking comment Wednesday, although the ACLU has frequently criticized curfews in other communities.

“The new law would infringe on the long-recognized rights of parents to direct the upbringing of their children as they see fit,” the ACLU wrote last month regarding a proposed curfew in East Syracuse.

“Local governments should strive to improve public safety, but not by infringing on the Constitutional rights of youth or passing judgment on parental decision making,” said Barrie Gewanter, director of the Central New York chapter of the ACLU regarding the proposed law in East Syracuse.

Richardson said he would only support the proposed law if he believed that village residents were in favor of it.

“If they don’t want it, I’ll vote against it. If they feel it’s good, we’ll give it a shot,” he said. “I work for them.”



Share story:   print   email +digg
+fark
+reddit
+facebook
+del.icio.us
+stumbleupon

comments


July 3, 2008
7:25 a.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
annarondac ( no real name given ) says...

I actually detest alliance with the ACLU, however, in this case they might be on the right side of the law. Enforcing existing law, as in under age drinking and not smoking pot would be the better solution. Perhaps the police patrols should switch their work force to more night time patrols than day time to get this situation under control. Remember, kids now smoking and drinking underage will not be stopped by a curfew, they will become more creative in breaking the law. That is what kids are great at doing.

Also, neighborhood watches and citizens reporting wrongdoing would help take back the neighborhood rather than making new law that restricts law abiding citizens.

July 3, 2008
8:41 a.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
adkalmanack ( no real name given ) says...

So, kids who join the military at seventeen won't be able to walk down the street in their own hometown after 11 pm without being harassed as possible criminals - interesting approach from the small-minded.

What's next - people serving in the military who are seventeen won't be able to vote? Oh.. wait... that one... ooops.

Or won't be able to have a beer with their parents... oh... wait..

Ahhh... puritan values. Gotta love em.

July 3, 2008
11:13 a.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
annarondac ( no real name given ) says...

17 year old "Adults" can have a beer with their parents. Not without.

July 4, 2008
7:27 a.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
coachmike ( no real name given ) says...

What is wrong with puritan values..it beats the " NO " values they are being taught today..( of course not meaning all parents" but it does prove there are a majority of parents who just can not define themselves as parents ! Maybe there should be a curfew on anyone being outside after a certain time, after all the parents are sometimes worse then the kids..

Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)

In Today's Gazette...
December 4, 2008

Poll
How do you expect your holiday shopping habits to change this year?







See the results


Services



Ask A Doctor

Bridal Show